CVE-2016-10367: In Opsview Monitor Pro (Prior to 5.1.0.162300841, prior to 5.0.2.27475, prior to 4.6.4.162391051, and 4.5.x without a…
- Is it exploited?
Reported, not confirmed by CISA. VulnCheck KEV lists it as exploited in the wild. CISA has not added it to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog as of .
VulnCheck KEV lists it since . It cites 1 public report, the first from .
- How likely is exploitation in the next 30 days?
- 16.1%
EPSS score, percentile 96.9 of all scored records. A probability estimated by FIRST, not a report of exploitation.
- How severe?
- Not scored
The CVE record carries no CVSS score.
- What should I do?
CISA has set no required action, because the vulnerability is not in KEV.
The CVE record links no vendor advisory, patch or mitigation.
- Which versions are affected?
Not stated. The CVE record gives vendor and product as “n/a” and the version as “unspecified”.
Source: CISA KEV 2026.10.29, as of ; VulnCheck KEV, as of ; FIRST EPSS, as of ; CVE List, as of . About the data.
Description
In Opsview Monitor Pro (Prior to 5.1.0.162300841, prior to 5.0.2.27475, prior to 4.6.4.162391051, and 4.5.x without a certain 2016 security patch), an unauthenticated Directory Traversal vulnerability can be exploited by issuing a specially crafted HTTP GET request utilizing a simple URL encoding bypass, %252f instead of /.
Source: CVE List, as of . About the data.
What to do
Advisories and patches
The CVE record links no vendor advisory, patch or mitigation.
This summary is based on the CVE record as of . Check the vendor's advisory before you act: affected versions and fixes can change.
Affected products and versions
The CVE record does not name affected products or versions: vendor and product are “n/a” and the version is “unspecified”.
Source: CVE List, as of . About the data.
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| CVE record published | |
| CVE record last updated |