CVE-2026-109142: Krill treats a "local parent" as already-authenticated, letting a CA operator act as any child of any CA on the same server
- Is it exploited?
Not on CISA's list. CISA has not added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog as of . If CISA adds it, this page shows it as known exploited.
- How likely is exploitation in the next 30 days?
- 0.3%
EPSS score, percentile 20.3 of all scored records. A probability estimated by FIRST, not a report of exploitation.
- How severe?
- 8.4 High
CVSS v3.1 base score, given by the CNA
- What should I do?
This issue is fixed in 0.16.1 and all later versions.Solution from the CVE record.
CISA has set no required action, because the vulnerability is not in KEV.
- Which versions are affected?
Unaffected 0.16.1
Source: CISA KEV 2026.11.10, as of ; FIRST EPSS, as of ; CVE List, as of . About the data.
Description
Krill treats a "local parent" as already-authenticated, letting a CA operator act as any child of any CA on the same server
When a CA's parent lives on the same Krill server: instead of building and verifying a signed CMS message, it runs the RFC 6492 provisioning exchange in-process and trusts the child identity (child_handle) that the caller put in the parent contact. Nothing checks that this child identity actually belongs to the CA making the request.
Source: CVE List, as of . About the data.
What to do
Advisories and patches
This summary is based on the CVE record as of . Check the vendor's advisory before you act: affected versions and fixes can change.
Affected products and versions
Versions by product, as listed in the CVE record (1 product)
| Status | Versions |
|---|---|
| Unaffected | 0.16.1 |
Versions not listed are: affected.
Versions the record lists as unaffected: 0.16.1.
Source: CVE List, as of . About the data.
Weakness
CWE-639
- CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
CWE and CAPEC are maintained by MITRE; the entries are those named in the CVE record.
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| CVE record published |