VulnTideExploited vulnerabilities, by vendor. Data as of .
Not in CISA KEVPublished CVSS 5.8 mediumEPSS 0.2% probability of exploitation in 30 daysFound by AI: AISLE
Red Hat

CVE-2026-110133: Ghostscript: heap buffer overflow in ghostscript truetype outliner due to npointstotal integer underflow during retry rollback

Is it exploited?

Not on CISA's list. CISA has not added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog as of . If CISA adds it, this page shows it as known exploited.

How likely is exploitation in the next 30 days?
0.2%

EPSS score, percentile 14.5 of all scored records. A probability estimated by FIRST, not a report of exploitation.

How severe?
5.8 Medium

CVSS v3.1 base score, given by the CNA

What should I do?

CISA has set no required action, because the vulnerability is not in KEV.

The CVE record links no vendor advisory, patch or mitigation.

Which versions are affected?

Versions by product

Source: CISA KEV 2026.10.30, as of ; FIRST EPSS, as of ; CVE List, as of . About the data.

Description

Ghostscript: heap buffer overflow in ghostscript truetype outliner due to npointstotal integer underflow during retry rollback

A flaw was found in Ghostscript. When processing a specially crafted TrueType font or document embedding one, an accounting error during font rendering can bypass buffer size checks, triggering a heap-based buffer overflow. A remote attacker could exploit this by enticing a victim or automated service to open the malicious content, potentially resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) crash or arbitrary code execution.

Source: CVE List, as of . About the data.

What to do

Advisories and patches

The CVE record links no vendor advisory, patch or mitigation.

Workaround (from the CVE record)

To mitigate this issue, avoid processing untrusted documents or standalone TrueType fonts with Ghostscript. If feasible, disable TrueType instruction execution within Ghostscript configurations. Consult Ghostscript documentation for specific configuration options to disable TrueType instruction execution. Running Ghostscript in a restrictive sandbox environment can also reduce the blast radius of potential exploitation.

This summary is based on the CVE record as of . Check the vendor's advisory before you act: affected versions and fixes can change.

Affected products and versions

Versions by product, as listed in the CVE record (5 products)
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
StatusVersions

Versions not listed are: affected.

Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
StatusVersions

Versions not listed are: unknown.

Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
StatusVersions

Versions not listed are: affected.

Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
StatusVersions

Versions not listed are: affected.

Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
StatusVersions

Versions not listed are: affected.

Source: CVE List, as of . About the data.

Weakness

CWE-122

CWE and CAPEC are maintained by MITRE; the entries are those named in the CVE record.

Timeline

DateEvent
CVE record published

References

2

Known exploited Red Hat vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2015-3246: Red Hat Libuser Race Condition Vulnerability (added )
  • CVE-2015-5287: Red Hat Automatic Bug Reporting Tool Privilege Escalation Vulnerability (added )
  • CVE-2018-14667: Red Hat JBoss RichFaces Framework Expression Language Injection Vulnerability (added )
  • CVE-2021-3560: Red Hat Polkit Incorrect Authorization Vulnerability (added )
  • CVE-2021-4034: Red Hat Polkit Out-of-Bounds Read and Write Vulnerability (added )