VulnTideExploited vulnerabilities, by vendor. Data as of .
Not in CISA KEVPublished CVSS 10.0 criticalEPSS 0.4% probability of exploitation in 30 days
saltyorg

CVE-2026-55675: Salty documentation workflow executes fork-controlled Python build hooks with deployment secrets

Is it exploited?

Not on CISA's list. CISA has not added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog as of . If CISA adds it, this page shows it as known exploited.

How likely is exploitation in the next 30 days?
0.4%

EPSS score, percentile 36.9 of all scored records. A probability estimated by FIRST, not a report of exploitation.

CISA's SSVC assessment in the CVE record lists exploitation as poc.

How severe?
10.0 Critical

CVSS v3.1 base score, given by the CNA

What should I do?

CISA has set no required action, because the vulnerability is not in KEV.

The CVE record links no vendor advisory, patch or mitigation.

Which versions are affected?

Affected

  • < 649c9aea2dae

Versions by product

Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, 2026.10.28, as of ; FIRST Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), v2026.06.15, as of ; CVE List V5 (CVE Program), cve_2026-10-29_0000Z, as of . About the data.

What to do

Advisories and patches

The CVE record links no vendor advisory, patch or mitigation.

Affected products and versions

As listed in the CVE record.

saltyorg docs
StatusVersions
Affected< 649c9aea2dae

Source: CVE List V5 (CVE Program), cve_2026-10-29_0000Z, as of . About the data.

About this vulnerability

The Salty documentation repository builds and deploys the docs.saltbox.dev website. Prior to commit 649c9aea2daef1168eeb0415b44e65dbbde9f220, .github/workflows/trigger-pr-build.yml records an untrusted fork commit in the pr_info artifact, and the secret-bearing workflow_run job in .github/workflows/build-pr.yml checks out that commit before running pip install -r requirements.txt. A fork pull req…

Summary: CVE record, as of .

  • CISA has not added CVE-2026-55675 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, as of 28 Oct 2026.
  • The CVE record was published on 13 Oct 2026.
  • The CVE record carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 10.0 (Critical), given by its CNA.
  • FIRST's EPSS model puts the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.4% (percentile 36.9), as of 29 Oct 2026. EPSS is a statistical estimate, not a report of exploitation.
  • CISA's SSVC assessment in the CVE record: exploitation poc, automatable yes, technical impact total.

Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, 2026.10.28, as of ; CVE List V5 (CVE Program), cve_2026-10-29_0000Z, as of ; FIRST Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), v2026.06.15, as of . About the data.

Description

Salty documentation workflow executes fork-controlled Python build hooks with deployment secrets

The Salty documentation repository builds and deploys the docs.saltbox.dev website. Prior to commit 649c9aea2daef1168eeb0415b44e65dbbde9f220, .github/workflows/trigger-pr-build.yml records an untrusted fork commit in the pr_info artifact, and the secret-bearing workflow_run job in .github/workflows/build-pr.yml checks out that commit before running pip install -r requirements.txt. A fork pull request can therefore supply attacker-authored setup.py or PEP 517 build hooks whose installation code executes in the privileged base-repository workflow with CF_API_TOKEN, GH_TOKEN, MKDOCS_GIT_COMMITTERS_APIKEY, and a write-capable GITHUB_TOKEN, allowing secret disclosure and follow-on compromise. The vulnerability is not caused by the repository-fork guard, and the demonstrated path requires attacker control of fork content rather than merely the artifact metadata. This vulnerability is fixed with commit 649c9aea2daef1168eeb0415b44e65dbbde9f220.

Source: CVE List V5 (CVE Program), cve_2026-10-29_0000Z, as of . About the data.

Weakness

  • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
  • CWE-829: Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
  • CWE-1357: Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component

CWE and CAPEC are maintained by MITRE; the entries are those named in the CVE record.

Timeline

DateEvent
CVE record published

References