CVE-2026-60125: importModule function in MISP ignores per-organisation import module restrictions

Is it exploited?

Not on CISA's list. CISA has not added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog as of 29 Oct 2026. If CISA adds it, this page shows it as known exploited.

How likely is exploitation in the next 30 days?

0.4%

EPSS score, percentile 28.7 of all scored records. A probability estimated by FIRST, not a report of exploitation.

How severe?

5.3 Medium

CVSS v4.0 base score, given by the CNA

What should I do?

CISA has set no required action, because the vulnerability is not in KEV.

Advisories and patches (1)

Which versions are affected?

Affected

• 2.5.42 and earlier

Versions by product

Source: CISA KEV 2026.10.29, as of 29 Oct 2026; FIRST EPSS, as of 29 Oct 2026; CVE List, as of 29 Oct 2026. About the data.

What to do

Advisories and patches

• github.com (Patch)

This summary is based on the CVE record as of 29 Oct 2026. Check the vendor's advisory before you act: affected versions and fixes can change.

Affected products and versions

As listed in the CVE record.

Versions not listed are: unaffected.

Source: CVE List, as of 29 Oct 2026. About the data.

About this vulnerability

MISP’s importModule() path used getEnabledModule() to resolve a single import module by name, but this lookup did not enforce the per-organisation module restriction checked by getEnabledModules(). As a result, an authenticated user from an organisation that was not allowed to use a module restricted via Plugin.Import_<module>_restrict could still invoke that import module directly if they knew i…

Summary: CVE record, as of 29 Oct 2026.

• CISA has not added CVE-2026-60125 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, as of 29 Oct 2026.
• The CVE record was published on 8 Jul 2026.
• The CVE record carries a CVSS v4.0 base score of 5.3 (Medium), given by its CNA.
• FIRST's EPSS model puts the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.4% (percentile 28.7), as of 29 Oct 2026. EPSS is a statistical estimate, not a report of exploitation.
• CISA's SSVC assessment in the CVE record: exploitation none, automatable no, technical impact partial.
• The credits in the CVE record name Anthropic (Claude) as finder.

Source: CISA KEV 2026.10.29, as of 29 Oct 2026; CVE List, as of 29 Oct 2026; FIRST EPSS, as of 29 Oct 2026. About the data.

Description

importModule function in MISP ignores per-organisation import module restrictions

MISP’s importModule() path used getEnabledModule() to resolve a single import module by name, but this lookup did not enforce the per-organisation module restriction checked by getEnabledModules(). As a result, an authenticated user from an organisation that was not allowed to use a module restricted via Plugin.Import_<module>_restrict could still invoke that import module directly if they knew its name. This could allow unauthorised access to restricted import-module functionality and, depending on the module and the user’s event permissions, may allow unauthorised import or modification of event data through a module that should have been unavailable to the user’s organisation.

Source: CVE List, as of 29 Oct 2026. About the data.

Timeline