VulnTideExploited vulnerabilities, by vendor. Data as of .
Not in CISA KEVReported exploited: VulnCheck KEV since Published CVSS 8.1 highEPSS 0.3% probability of exploitation in 30 days
trainingbusinesspros

CVE-2026-92975: Groundhogg <= 4.8.3 - Unauthenticated Privilege Escalation to Support User Identity Confusion

Is it exploited?

Reported, not confirmed by CISA. VulnCheck KEV lists it as exploited in the wild. CISA has not added it to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog as of .

VulnCheck KEV lists it since . It cites 1 public report, the first from .

How likely is exploitation in the next 30 days?
0.3%

Down from 0.4% on .

EPSS score, percentile 27.7 of all scored records. A probability estimated by FIRST, not a report of exploitation.

How severe?
8.1 High

CVSS v3.1 base score, given by the CNA

What should I do?

CISA has set no required action, because the vulnerability is not in KEV.

The CVE record links no vendor advisory, patch or mitigation.

Which versions are affected?

Affected

  • 4.8.3 and earlier

Versions by product

Source: CISA KEV 2026.10.29, as of ; VulnCheck KEV, as of ; FIRST EPSS, as of ; CVE List, as of . About the data.

Description

Groundhogg <= 4.8.3 - Unauthenticated Privilege Escalation to Support User Identity Confusion

The Groundhogg — CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 4.8.3 via the `create_support_user()` function. This is due to the function identifying the support account solely by matching against publicly hardcoded constants — `user_login` `'groundhogg'` and email addresses `'[email protected]'` / `'[email protected]'` — where the `in_array()` email-equality check at line 238 is not a security boundary because any user fully controls their own email value. This makes it possible for an attacker with an account whose `user_login` is `'groundhogg'` and whose `user_email` matches one of the hardcoded support constants to have that account silently promoted to administrator — and additionally to super admin on multisite when the triggering administrator holds `manage_network_options` — resulting in full site takeover. Exploitation requires a two-actor flow: the attacker must first obtain or pre-plant an account with the hardcoded credentials (possible when open user registration is enabled or another account-creation path exists), after which a legitimate administrator must invoke the support-access feature via the `submit_ticket` or `process_send_support_access` entry points to trigger the promotion.

Source: CVE List, as of . About the data.

What to do

Advisories and patches

The CVE record links no vendor advisory, patch or mitigation.

This summary is based on the CVE record as of . Check the vendor's advisory before you act: affected versions and fixes can change.

Affected products and versions

Versions by product, as listed in the CVE record (1 product)
trainingbusinesspros Groundhogg — CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation
StatusVersions
Affected4.8.3 and earlier

Versions not listed are: unaffected.

Source: CVE List, as of . About the data.

Weakness

CWE-269
  • CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management

CWE and CAPEC are maintained by MITRE; the entries are those named in the CVE record.

Timeline

DateEvent
CVE record published
CVE record last updated

References

7